Confession: No pun intended.

 In regards to the Tetrahedron of Everything, I may need to give credit to Ken Wilber.  While I was not aware of it at the time, and I had recovered it base on earlier work of mine(i.e. a reading of Plato’s Republic), I may need to give him credit for it.  Even to the point of unconsciously stealing it lock, stock and barrel.  Alternatively it is a case of synchronicity* but it turns out, he had a late night radio program from 1973 to 1982 about such “new age” matters.  This coincides with a period I worked mostly graveyard shifts and had access to a radio.  I recovered this not only through Plato other fields of study.  Only thanks to a  question to Meta AI did I discover that he had the same disciplines on the vertices of the tetrahedron.  They are Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.  HOWEVER: while this has not been run through AI even for cleanup, in a quick search I could not find the sources for what AI had given me on another device.    

A more comprehensive search (who came up with the Tetrahedron of Everything Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.) does not find what I have on my other device either.  But it does remind me to credit Buckminster Fuller who I saw speak at our high school in the early 70’s. Then there is Milo Wolfe who I can not place on the timeline of this process.  More credit to be processed.

https://youtu.be/bc5V_YXvGC8   This has not been viewed yet, but shows four people I have studied.  Three of them in one class.  “Marx, Nietzsche, Freud” and Einstein an early publication.  Sometime in the early 70’s I read the book, Man and his Symbols by Joseph Campbell, with a forward by Carl Jung.

* Update: I have found that Wilbur had not mentioned it until his book in 1995. Which I did not read or have.

5-9-26  However Arthur Youg mentioned a Tetrahedron of Will in 1976>

Bio ~ engineering.

My first major was Chemical Engineering at USC before a stint in their East Asian Languages and Cultures Department.*  After a sabbatical for a number of years, the result was a BA in Liberal Studies at the University of Washington.

[anachronistic writing]**
*removing the impression that I am at all responsible for the hyperlink
** the following are notes in progress akin to side notes on a page being read

NOTES:
Madhyamaka     /     Dialetheist       crazy ~  unmattaka
M-theory of D {?}
Paraconsistent Logic
Paradox ~ ironic ~ rhetorical device
Conceptualization ~/~ falsifies

Nietzsche: tT~ER (eternal recurrence)
Radical Contextualist Semantics ~requires meaning
Statement ~\~ truthmaker (not required)

=====================   segue   ==========
W-Theory  ~ Milo Wolff
Logical Positivism   Fusion v. Confluence
Defluence is the struggle[!]
=====================   theory?==========
LEVEL TWO NOTES:
W for Wolff AND Wave
Not to mention paradox of M.
Model / Madhyamaka / meaning?
D for Dialetheist, Dimensions and Design
Even rougher notes:
Paraconsistent Wittgenstein
Popper's poker.
=============
Then there is Methane[!]
Big T, and small t: Truth and Tetrahedron
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* asterisk info only added 5-2-16
Pardon my style.

Heidegger

Runes
Dagobert

Speaking of input, some have dissolved.
(TryUnism and* Punderous Pondering.)

*not exactly the link
(diaspora ofor the state)

[tan gents] Heidegger, Wittgenstein, Nietzsche , enatiodromia, Many Key an.

[~] 
[!]
x, y, z

New Meta Theory

The anthropomorphism of systems.**

Have your ad hominem and eat it too.

[The Digger You Deep?]*

*NFRY
**The personalization of math, geometry and logic.

[** + * =  Quantum Sovereignty ]

Is it possible this is the nexus of Science and Theology?
Is it Schroedingers' coin of epistemology? 
Is this support for the small "t", large "T": truth of Nietzsche?
[[ footnotes to reading*: "dangers in overemphasizing(...~...)"perplexed by the relation"{subject/object/rules}(5.)]] 
Now that may be the ticket!!!  Knot?^  The faith ~ science nexus.

{{Rough ramble:  3 dimensions are?  4this? 5th other!
Perpendicular perspective: x,y,z, space~time/point~sphere }}
{{{The result is in the balance.}}}
^/*

Hegelian Rationality?

HR? Proposed Concept.

For the science religion dichotomy/dilemma. (1-2)
Rationality and irrationality at(3) the same table, and in the same chair.  (shoes/feet/mouth/toss)*
VC: a Virtuous Clog?  P5+1 example.  Cotton pick'n GOP another. 
State of Strauss and the Torah the antithesis? 

Zion is asemantic!

Process proposal?  Kant we... Waltz?

*pundittering additions
(#'d)inserts [ s~r , d/d ]  :: (3) youtube IAM  :: VC vital cognisance? :: State'n Hegel? 
Original aphorism?  (Wit'N Pythagorus)
Lables TBA : T'issue Tan'go?  :: (to be Kantinued)

M-bed F'N:
Strauss :  a. No Teddy , Para~graph Three! , Monday Morning Rally... , Bin(un)Jun'Go , Hegelian Rationality? , Neo-changian? , Relemma'n Leo , Esoteric Relemma[!]
  
RIG^ / SOG subj/obj geometry  : RIG'N progress ~ N = poetics^ / Nietzsche? (tot~ology)
 [ dit , IF,  IW ] ~ lie`bearE? akin to NFR~'Y
Numbers R objective ideal and subjective reality? Cultural conditioning? 25~min.> systemic analysis/
meanfeltic[!] stastical rhetoric?  Meta-Clastic?

Para~graph Three!

Endo-terror~cism?

aka Academics ?

The point?  The esoterics of Strauss maybe the Socratics of Plato, or exoterics of Neitzsche.

Ctrl F (academic:~:academics)
:::  aka [a. FOOTNOTE JUNE 2013 PAGE TWO, b. The Daily Counter Balance , c.(J) In the begining... , (D)BoC, e. Belated Breaking News! , f. THE COUNCIL OF NICE , h. Back-Log August 19th, ("religious ghetto") , i.(G).]
:::   ? [a. Looking Back , b. "if I were dictator" , c. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! , d. Bane(Or) Change , e. Conservative Foray (4A) ,  f. Blame to go around? , g. Will Safire Replaced by Will I ams., h. Academic Freedom , i. Framing Narratives , j. In the begining... , k. Technical Difficulties , l. The Thorn and the Lyin' , m. Running Joke , n. Let me finish? , o. We are at the table. , p.Forward (Ironically)  ]
(what the fudge?  f-j,p?)
:::   Endo-suffix?

The project  ?   The dance? 
"Esotericism is the practice, widely employed by a variety of thinkers prior to and up through the early Enlightenment, of disguising their real meaning through ellipsis, surface contradiction, dispersal of their real arguments, and the like (indeed—they were misleading casual readers about their true intentions!). The understanding that philosophers like Plato and Aristotle made use of esotericism was central to Strauss’s own project of returning to their thought as an antidote to what he called the “crisis of modernity”, since it pointed to deeper truths hidden behind the evident meaning extracted by superficial readers. It was probably also one of the sources of distrust of Strauss and his followers by other academics, since it implied that initiates into the art of esoteric interpretation had access to meanings unavailable to others." Francis Fukuyama.
Or Ecto~tonics of Aristotle?  Less than Ionic that paranormal came up in  English [?]
P.4,The Prince misquote? P.5 "undermine dogmatism" bingo~? P.6 Nietzsche Recurrance
"That latter struggle was ultimately won, and led to the triumph of the “harmonist” view, now almost universally accepted, that philosophical truth could be made compatible with and indeed supportive of modern politics. Transparency is today the name of that venerable game. Classical philosophers like Plato and Aristotle had a different view; namely, that philosophical skepticism undermined the irrational beliefs necessary to the maintenance of a political community and therefore needed to be kept under wraps. As Melzer points out, there is a large body of contemporary scholarship that actively contends that virtually no one other than a few cranks ever wrote esoterically; he performs a great service by, first, showing that the claim is empirically wrong, and second, that it is itself an historically contingent interpretation." (ibid.)
 
2-25-15 2 ~ B Kantinued ;-) R I P ? [!]
(1) a. Who Let the Dogs Out?, b. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government., c. ...what about the damage to your Presidency?, (d.) The Curve or Nuance Thing, e. Doxology.
(2)~
(3)  The Be All and End All?

Pen~ta-gone? i.e. P5
"This section of the book is wonderfully erudite and leaves no uncertainty that esotericism was indeed a major art that is now all but lost. Melzer points to four reasons for past uses of esotericism. First, it served as protection from prosecution; he notes its widespread use in totalitarian countries like the former Soviet Union and contemporary China. Second, it served to protect the political community from dangerous truths, such as philosophical skepticism about the city’s gods and traditions; third, it served a pedagogical purpose by forcing readers to engage on a deeper level; and fourth, it was used as a transitional strategy for modern writers seeking to undermine dogmatism." (ibid)
P6?  At this Platonic # I will note Aristotle's place in the Nietzschean struggle.  
Hence Fukuyama is a difficult read of Strauss and Plato who are difficult reads.

P7? "If Philosophy Between the Lines were simply a book..." (where P = par.) I might plow on[!]
@9   "Strauss’s central concern was what he called the 'crisis of modernity', where the project of using philosophical reason for practical purposes was in danger of collapse."
@12 "The recovery of the rationalist project was central to Strauss’s life work—"
Having now fully read it, I will let you decide.

Neo-changian?

Naturally Evolving Order !

2-24-15 BIN~GO[!]
A fifth dimention or shun*. See (e,r,s)

C-BIN: Neo-con Pope?  Saint maybe, you can't have a dead Pope, but it would be more convenient.
Not to mention RE:cc(card carrying; Nietzsche?)  Methane?(~)

(~) wordplay @"BIN" especially :50 mark.  Eggs in one hen?

FP here{in one}.
(egg,road, sky: a. FP4 SEPT 2014 , b. Work in Progress , c. Egg/Road/Sky* , d. Speculative Physics )
Self- anomaly
St. Maybe[!]  Rooting^ for Strauss[?]

^Pla(N)tonic(~)
*  Forward (Ironically) (S~hun~T[!])
??? 

Republicans can't run against congress anymore.

Wanna bet ? 
That's sarcasm, not a wager.
It will have to be a do something congress. 

(FN?) not ready to footnote:
1.  Republicans Gain Four Governorships, Bucking Anti-Incumbency Fever
2.  A. The Jig is Up?, B. The Real B. S. of the F. C.
3.  Former Republican senator sees potential doom in Cantor loss
4. Bad News, Good News. (~)Trick Question of the Day?, (~)Inconvenient, What President Obama should say tomorrow., Debate: Take One  
(~)  QCON: TruthOut, Trick Question of the Day?, FORGOTTEN HUMANITY! (A, B, C)
(^)  Tea Party Down Grade, Bleep 'n Compromise (Dept Ceiling) Review**, Hoof and Mouth. (A, B, C)

(~) (usc)~ you scroll click re:anomaly

[AM Rep Cong leader makes good points about Harry Reid, but ignores original obstructionists and power of purse*.  Rance Priebus and top down selection.] 
Ron an Daily Obama and the leaders.
[RFD, RFD2 , ]
* posted pre-Mitch McConnell address.
[Washington Post: Obama Transcript]


11-6-14
Divide to concur[!]
Yeah, that's the gay divorce[!] aka ticket ala Nietzsche.  No more kickin' the "kickin' the can game" down the road.  What doesn't kill ya may make you vote.
AKA States Right, People Left
[Manchin]
{RM, RM2, RM3,}
Point counterpoint?

 

Mises...

in the corner ?

Caution: I have only read the last link, and this might seem a balancing* of fallacies**.
Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean they have nothing to offer, and of course your perspective might influence both.  Ths seems more a selection of unfinishted reads, although I did read Huntington, and gave a good shot at Sandel, and found Hasnas, and Fukuyama is a big bugaboo, as we come around to Nietzsche and Rand. 

*read juggling ?
** all thinking must be taken in the context of their times as well as the method of the format.
example:  Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine***, Aquinas and the web they weave sometimes in character or others.  Not to mention More's the Pity.

a. A Shot in the Arm?
(b.)^ The Bully...
c. GOP-GAP

^ new notation for (sc)
*** Punderous Ponderings
[Speaking of the corner, is it MAR (mutually assured rhetoric?)  The corollary, just because some have something to offer, does not mean they got it.]
(pocket ?)

Epicyclical Poet Tree

The Ying and Yang of our Duelity*.

Life is the content in context**.


*this line is the lede / our Nietzsche the heading / the word is b.s.^
** Is this line the Hitch or Hedge hiker?

(FP!)  notation means to eventually transfer to (FP#)

^ I don't mean THE word, but duelity^^ is more like TryUnism. ***

*** I am not a #[!] nor just pun. (FP2)

^^ Spoiler Alert: Not actually, but I just found a legitimate prior user of the word, so I cannot claim coin-age, let alone be sure I have not run into it via its usage somewhere.
*^ / ^^  i.e. "duelity" is no longer my coinage. In fact I must revamp or revisit coin-age v. coin age and labels.  However I may have exfloE8ed TryUnism with Twryality. (Think Domino Theory and 4D Jenga!) (Jenga is already 3D, and Dominoes is not the theory but about Hoyle.)

AM Calm PACtification

Is it KBH who suggests on Andrea Mitchell* that the president is not negotiating?
Apparently the end is near[!]
(Ctrl F Nietzsche/End of History)
Not to pun on will or Frederick or Fukuyama,
but a new para-dime, and the summit of our perdicament.

* 9-27-13 Thought so. She held Cruz's seat. The President campaigning, delaying, tweaking.  Ctrl F, "stomach", "framework" but  George F. Will , says complete the neutering.  And I had yet to see his Ike reference.(FP1) c-[!] 9-26 & (O+drama) (FP2) "end"/"is" & C- Ctrl F and cap it toll ization.

 

MAY 2013 Footnotes Page Two

5-1-13 : Irk Sum is the pun on... Happy May Day!
"carefully" continued: A, B(b), c, D, e, f, G(g), h, I (i)...M(m), N...T

5-6-13 "wiggle room" insert post footnote daylight(b.s.)? [Our Story , Following results.] Knot Now and Richard Engle on AM.

5-10-13 Spinning / off:  A. Mmmm MOW, MOW,  B. Tin Foil Herman, C. R.S.V.P.  /  A. The Read C? , B,  C,  D, E. Simon says..., F. The History of B.S.,  G. What the Beck? // Knot Exactly!

5-15-13 (s.c.) secondary clicks [!] Nietzsche’s Marginal Children: On Friedrich Hayek, The Latvia Illusion, Deficit emergency over.

5-17-13: Further Fodder for... Not to dis defense or commanders ... 

5-30-13: not exactly labelism [?]

(fn)TOO Point OH[!]

FOOTNOTE PAGE TWO: January 2013
note placement date v. time stamp
(bold and unbold)
1-3-13 that is the quest : place holder 4 (sc), BLANK NETWORK(sc), Who got the memo?(sc),  Educat or,  New York Times(sc), Safire Proved Urban Legend Monger(sc)
HECUVA TANGENT

1-3-13  Spare Me (SC): (b.s.) "Tales" of sorts[^] :
Re: Leads(?), A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the News Stand , Not to make light... (), Niche for our Nietzsche() , Tails Aside (), The Real Deal() , Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (sc) (7?)

1-7-13 Foot in mouth?   Means Trumps Meaning, but can't read memos. , Try-Mentionalism ?[!] , Snooki? , "a royal huff" , The Alter of Tax Cuts ?

1-11-13  SNAP (sic) i.e. [!] or spell check double check AKA unintended CAD? Root cause?  CapTenseLog[!] running in draft.

1-14-13   nor  link or punt?
Waking up to a New Year.  //  Ghost of X-mas Passed. , The other ground game...

1-16-13 [1] off law and lalaland?

Memories...or Excusing Pre-quashing (sc) the FeeNix? , "buying a stairway"  , Oh Sasha! , Running Joke

 

NPR [!]

 

 

 

 



C#PO(correction) C3PO

[FOOTNOTES (#3) NOVEMBER 2012]
Scroll down for most recent.

[Posted 11-8-12] F'n 3 point oh?
Footnotes on Tan Gents. 
C 4* congress?
Conn Sciousness?
* 4 mat review ?
Not?

11-30-12 "the boat we are all in."
UNDERCONSTRUCTION or_RE_DE_: PROGRESS and CONGRESS
"all"= (b.s.)"golden + rule"
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/05/golden-rule-in-progress.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2004/09/running-on-what-rhetorical.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/10/what-me-worry.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2006/09/1st-thing-that-went-wrong.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/04/tetra-heed-ron.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/04/inconvenient-segue.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/01/martin-luther-king-jr-day.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/06/hi-ate-us.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/06/ideology.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/05/justice.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/01/on-level.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2010/06/just-to-clarify.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/05/taking-bear-by-horns.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/10/tetrahedron-ramble.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2006/11/mess-age-is-message.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2006/10/whatsoever-man-soweth.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2004/09/stuart-smally-anyone.html
(b.s.) works in* mysterious** ways.
* a, b, c, d, e
** a, d, c, x, e, y (alpha-ibid-zed and why!)
Note: only covered the "all" & "in", these are the links that works at this time, and may leave "boat"(cats + dogs) and "we" 4 later.***
*** actually that is all there R : The (b.s.) of "we" is "4" now and "works"!!!!!!

11-9-12 (fn) too  much ? [!]
Labels Ouch "cap that" M-beds.(CONN Sciousness) Jung, Nietzsche, Maslow (Transition of Sorts)

11-10-12: UNqEd/reCap(l5) =/aka line five not LXV but that is pound too Roman. i.e. Ibid. of sorts.
Furhter editors note:
Fup='d "follow up"
There are presently 3 footnotes for November w/hope to keep it that way.
This 4mat was begun in September I think.
There are presently 11 links with 33 [CtrlF]"Ibid"'s@(b.s.)"Ibid" as follows,
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/12/flow-of-conscience.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/08/inet.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/08/republicans-cuts-and-runs.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/07/too-cubed-viii.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/09/politics-is-local.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/09/out-foxed.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/09/footnotes-september-2012.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/06/ideology.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/02/report-from-sabbatical.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/12/rubrics-cube-and-rhetorical.html

 

Primary Boogeyman

Rule to the Exception.
Freedom / Hardball
Mitt Romney wins, Paul 2nd, Huntsman 3rd.
Gingrich and South Carolina next.
Huntsman ticket to ride or flavor of moment?

Yeah that's the ticket, but here is even more.

There is the old adage "divide and conquer",
but then there is the exception that proves the rule.
If Republican political calculus is anything, it is attack strength.
Economic Freedom is the key.
What it means, is the meme.
Absolutism may be the red flag of the Teddy Bull,
but the cape* of the progressive.

*Ctrl F "Nietzsche"

[Romney indeed made history as the first non-incumbent Republican to win both Iowa and New Hampshire, but given recent history, Fukuyama and the Neo-cons, it seems to fit the Primary Boogeyman frame, not to mention unprecedented Bush the Uniter.]

[1-11-12 CBS Christie Does Cynical Well, "Jersey-Style" **
CBS Poll Romney beats Obama,
Michelle Beats Anger.]
[My original intent here yesterday, was a Primary Colors reference, and a pun on Exception to Rule, not The Rule, but don't step on my blue suede shoes. (Reference post-**)]

[** I mean the Governor of New Jersey does "lame" well, if as Romney's "hit man" he is accusing Obama of not doing anger well.  Is that Neo-Boogeyman?  A flip-flop of the Doom and Gloom, and more of the Fear and Smear.  Governor Christie is the Sarah Palin with Lip Schtick.  Ouch, that was not to imply that he is a VP choice, but given the frame maybe.  When I use Hyperlink, I use Hyperlink. ]

[4a continued:  Freedom is not a tool***, but an end that doesn't justify economics.  This is my riff off of only the 1st paragraph of The Economist, on Economic blogs and "A less dismal debate." After reading it more fully(see ***) a funny thing happened on the way to the for 'em.  Actually it only hinges on the "tool" concept and the nature of "innovation" and the nature of economic debates.  Not that I have more than glanced at the debate example, but it also hinges on the nature of people as well as material or ideological forms.]
*** again note anacronism of 4m (see asterisks and bracketeds) as I evolved the post comma segment.[being in magazine 4m another one of the 4a.] (Note technical difficulties, uncertain if any threads or hyperlinks are lost, but I close in the middle of reading Marginal Revolutionaries in hard copy.)]


< previous post >

Economics 2011

Ravi Batra's Weapons of Mass Exploitation.(Economics For Beginners)
Is the United States broke?
Who broke it?
Economics in One Lesson.*
(Austrian) Economics in One Lesson**

* actually a review of Economics in One Lesson, which includes a caution for those without "a significant amount of economics", they may risk "permanent neurological and ideological damage".***

** Austro-Libertarian Economics (Mises Project Video)

*** seriously [Stick to bold links to be safe: I don't know if it is just me, or my Economics 250 A&B, or my Marx, Nietzsche, Freud 374, but I am not sure I will risk a full read or view of Economics in One Lesson. But I will say, as Nietzche put it there is German thinking and there is Oriental thinking; linear and wholistic (not to put things in black and white). Then (I might say)there is Austrian thinking; not to cast aspersions of intent or geographical origins, but I will follow up with related Economics (and other)links that I feel are helpful.]

Niche for our Nietzsche

It is not about US?
Hint: niche = field
Nietzsche i.e. proper name for our place?

[Update or bold us, with
Wake up and Eat Some Breakfast** posted from draft 12-29-10 and No Label added.*]
*not(just to be clear, I've add one label below and two links re: No Labels, but not re: Aye of Newt. Well maybe another label.)
[** breaking polling]
[twitter liberals? and here and Re:tales?]
[and Lagging Hope?]

Chart

Bank for the Buck
The Economy is not just Economics, and neither so economic.
Pun aside, it is real.

No irony intended, that too is germane.
[This was not an intended ribble, but if only I had flip-floppin fonts.]
[...sorry I was lost in google, and could not find my Post-Nietzschean-Manicheanism, but I will now coin* Post-Nietzschean-Manichean-Platonics or Ironic Nature of Balance.]
* embedded link
[8-12-10 Obama. Ribble, is accidental label, but maybe my Nietzsche. Value Vectoring? (vv)W Not!]

Niche

Where there is a why, there is a how.
The end does not justify the means.
Twilight of the models.
[I should leave this "as is", but I will continue a rant, (the link was only an after google.)]
Dennis Preager recently paraphrased Nietzsche, and G.W. Bush earlier refudiated* Machiavelli. If the end were to justify the means, what justifies the end? No pun on the variations of mean(etc.) but...[I hate to leave this rhetorical**, but...]

* actually?
** see "circular" in context(not to mention values/price/cost equations)